THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK OF ARTISANAL FISHING IN THE STATE OF CEARÁ, BRAZIL
Abstract
Traditional communities situated in mangrove forests near the coast have developed a way of life based on ecosystem services associated with various uses and activities (firewood extraction, artisanal fishing, crab and clam harvesting, etc.). The importance of food security and sovereignty is frequently mentioned in the context of small-scale fishing but has seldom been articulated as an explicit objective. The present work identifies a knowledge gap concerning the profits generated by artisanal exploitation, which are not recorded in official statistics. We compiled economic data from Cumbe and Curral Velho, in the state of Ceará (Brazil), using a combination of techniques (tracking tables, interviews, zoning and questionnaires). Fishermen typically work up to 5 hours a day for 4.6 days a week, working 23 hours/week, and earning € 127.20/week or € 5.53€/hour of work. It is concluded that the artisanal fishing carried out by coastal communities is not only economically viable but competes directly with industrial monocultures in terms of monetary income and workers’ leisure time.
References
ABURTO-OROPEZA O., EZCURRA E., DANEMANN G., VALDEZ, V., MURRAY J., and SALA E. Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105:10456-10459p.
ACOSTA V. G. Historia y desastres en América Latina (Vol. 1). La Red/Ciesas, 1996.
ACSELRAD H., CAMPELLO C., and MELLO G.N.B. O que é justiça ambiental. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Garamond, 156p., 2009.
ALONGI D.M. Present state and future of the world's mangrove forests. Environmental conservation 2002, 29(3): 331-349p.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRO DOS CRIADORES DE CAMARÃO ABCC. Projeto executivo para apoio político ao desenvolvimento do camarão marinho cultivado), Recife, Brasil. Available via MCR AQUACULTURA, 2004. Disponible: www.mcraquacultura.com,.br/arquivos/projeto/Marco 04.pdf. Acess: 20 Dez 2005.
BAILEY C. The social consequences of tropical shrimp mariculture development. Ocean and Shoreline Management, 1988, 11(1): 31-44.
BALVANERA P., and H. COTLER. Acercamientos al estudio de los servicios ecosistémicos. 2007, Gaceta Ecológica 84-85:8-15.
BARBIER E.B., M. ACREMAN, and D. KNOWLER. Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997.
BARBIER E.B., and I. STRAND . Valuing Mangrove Fishery Linkages: A Case Study of Campeche, Mexico. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998, 12:151–166.
BELHABIB D., V. KOUTOB, A. SALL, et al. Fisheries catch misreporting and its implications: The case of Senegal. Fisheries Research, 2014, 151, 1-11.
BETORZ S.G., A.T. MERCADER, J.M. CAROL. Evaluación Ambiental de la Acuicultura de Camarón sobre el ecosistema Manglar en el tramo bajo del río Jaguaribe. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). Trabajo de fin de carrera, Barcelona, España, p 123, 2012.
BEVERIDGE, M.C.M.; KELLY, L. A. Aquaculture and biodiversity. Ambio 23:497-498, 1994.
BURRIEL M.C. L'altra cara del progr'es: estudi multidimensional sobre les conseqüències de les activitats d’explotació intensiva sobre les activitats derivades de les economies tradicionals a la comunitat de Cumbe, Brasil. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). Trabajo de fin de carrera, Barcelona, España, 2012, 147p.
BUTLER, C.D., W. Oluoch-Kosura. 2006. Linking future ecosystem services and future human well-being. Ecology and Society 11(1): 30.
CORPORACIÓN COORDINADORA NACIONAL PARA LA DEFENSA DEL ECOSISTEMA MANGLAR - C-CONDEM. Certificando la Destrucción: Análisis integral de la certificación orgánica a la acuacultura industrial de camarón en Ecuador. In: L.F. Góngora, M. T. Benavides (Ed). Ecuador, 2007, 66p.
CAROL J.M., J.P. SALVÀ, S.G. BETORZ. Análisis de la Dimensión Social y Económica de la Relación de la Comunidad de Cumbe con el Manglar y los impactos de la Industria Camaronera. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). Trabajo de fin de carrera, Barcelona, España, 100pp, 2012.
COSTANZA R., R. DARGE, R. De GROOT The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387:253–260.
COSTA-PIERCE B.A. The 'Blue Revolution' - Aquaculture must go green. World Aquaculture, 2002 33(4):4-5p.
DAILY G.C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, 1997, 392pp.
DEWALT B.R., P. VERGNE, and M. HARDIN. Shrimp aquaculture development and the environment: people, mangroves and fisheries on the Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras. World Development, 1996, 24(7):1193-1208p.
DIAS-NETO J., and J.F.O. DIAS. O uso da biodiversidade aquática no Brasil: uma avaliacao com foco na pesca. Ministério do meio Ambiente, Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2015) 290pp.
DIEGUES A.C. Pescadores, Camponeses e Trabalhadores do Mar. São Paulo, Ática, 1983, 287pp.
DIEGUES A.C., and R.S.V. ARRUDA . Saberes tradicionais e biodiversidade no Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, 2001, 176P.
DIELE K., V. KOCH, U. SAINT-PAUL. Population structure, catch composition and CPUE of the artisanally harvested mangrove crab Ucides cordatus (Ocypodidae) in the Caeté estuary, North Brazil: Indications for overfishing? Aquatic Living Resources, 2005, 18(2):169-178.
DOMINGUEZ J.C., J.A. MONRABA, M.M. BRIANSÒ. Estudio económico sobre la pesca artesanal y análisis de sus diferencias con la acuicultura del camarón. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). Trabajo de fin de carrera, Barcelona, España, 2014, 106p.
DUKE N.C., J.O. MEYNECKE, S. DITTMANN, A.M. ELLISON. A world without mangroves? Science, 2007, 317 (5834), 41–42.
ELLISON A.M. Managing mangroves with benthic biodiversity in mind: moving beyond roving banditry. Journal of Sea Research, 2008, 59:2-15p.
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA). 2004. Questões ambientais da carcinicultura de águas interiores: o caso da bacia do baixo Jaguaribe/Ceará. Fortaleza, Ceará. 51 p.
FAO Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Mangroves of South America 1980–2005: country reports. Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper No. 139, 2007. Rome. [online] URL: www.fao.org/forestry/site/mangrove/statistics.
FAO Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Directrices voluntarias para lograr la sostenibilidad de la pesca en pequeña escala en el contexto de la seguridad alimentaria y la erradicación de la pobreza. Roma, 2015, 25 pp.
FARLEY J., D. BATKER D., I. de la TORRE, and T. HUDSPETH . Conserving mangrove ecosystems in the Philippines: transcending disciplinary and institutional borders. Environmental Management, 2010, 45:39-51p.
FIRMO A.M., M.M. TOGNELLA, S.R. SILVA, R.R. BARBOZA, and ALVES R.R. Capture and commercialization of blue land crabs ("guaiamum") Cardisoma guanhumi (Lattreille, 1825) along the coast of Bahia State, Brazil: an ethnoecological approach. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2012, 8(1):1-12p.
FLAHERTY M., and G. KARNJANAKESORN. Marine shrimp aquaculture and natural resource degradation in Thailand. Environmental Management, 1995, 19 (1):27-37pp.
FIELD C.B., J.G. OSBORN, L.L. HOFFMAN et al. Mangrove biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 1998, 7(1):3-14p.
GIRY F., T. BINET, and N. KEURMEUR. Les bénéfices de la protection des mangroves de l’outre-mer français par le Conservatoire du littoral: une évaluation économique à l’horizon 2040. Etudes caribéennes, 2017, Volume 35.
GODELIER M. L’idéel et le matériel. Paris: Fayard., 1984.
HELLEBRANDT D., E.H. ALLISON, and A. Delaporte. Segurança alimentar e pesca artesanal: análise crítica de iniciativas na América Latina. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 32, 2014.
HUSSAIN S.A., and R. BADOLA. Valuing mangrove benefits: contribution of mangrove forests to local livelihoods in Bhitarkanita Conservation Area, East Coast of India. Wetlands Ecolology and Management, 2010, 18: 321-331.
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Renováveis, Brasil (IBAMA). Diagnóstico da Carcinicultura no Estado do Ceará, relatório final. Vol. 1, 2005, 177 pp.
IBAMA Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. Estatística da pesca Brasil. Grandes regiões e unidades de federações. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília-DF, 2007.
KAUTSKY N., P. RÖNNBÄCK, M. TADENGREN, and M. TROELL. Ecosystem perspectives on management of disease in shrimp pond farming. Aquaculture, 2000, 191:145-161p.
KRONEN M. Fishing for fortunes? A socio-economic assessment of Tonga' s artisanal fisheries. Fisheries Research, 2004, 70:121-134.
KUHL L., and M.J. SHERIDAN. Stigmatized property, clams, and community in coastal Ecuador. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2009, 5: 1-22.
LÓPEZ-ANGARITA J., C.M. ROBERTS, A. TILLAY, J.P. HAWKINS, and R.G. COOKE. Mangroves and people: Lessons from a history of use and abuse in four Latin American countries. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 368: 151-162p.
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (MA) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis, 2005, 64p. http://www.bioquest.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/files/2009/06/ecosystems-and-health.pdf
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J. La defensa de los manglares contra la industria camaronera. Ecología Política, 2007, 41-48p
MEIRELES A.J.A., R.S. CASSOLA, S.V. TUPINAMBÁ, and L. QUEIROZ. Impactos ambientais decorrentes das atividades da carcinicultura ao longo do litoral cearense, nordeste do Brasil. Revista Mercator, 2007, 12:83-106p.
MEIRELES A.J.A., and L. QUEIROZ L. A monocultura do camarão: danos socioambientais à base da vida comunitária tradicional no litoral do Nordeste brasileiro. In: A. Zlnouri, K. Laschefski (Editores). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, 2010, pp. 224-249.
MONTSERRAT M.M., M. ORTEGA-CERDÀ, E.M. Villegas, and Ramos-Martín. Conflictos socio-ambientales de la acuicultura del camarón en Centroamérica. Un análisis desde la justicia ambiental. Fundación Barcelona, Colección DOCS Núm.1. Vilanova i la Geltrú: Fundació Ent., 2011.
MONSTSERRAT M.M. Conflictos socioambientales de la acuicultura del camarón en Centroamérica: un análisis desde la justicia ambiental. Ecología política, 2001, 41:90-96.
MPA Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura, 2012. Boletin Estatístico da Pesca e Aquicultura 2012. Brasil.
O’GARRA T. Bequest values for marine resources: how important for indigenous communities in less-developed economies?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 44(2): 179-202.
PEDROZO-ACUÑA A., R. DAMANIA, M.A. LAVERDE-BARAJAS, and D. MIRA-SALAMA. Assessing the consequences of sea-level 15 rise in the coastal zone of Quintana Roo, México: the costs of inaction. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 201519: 227-240.
PINHEIRO H.T., F. Di DARIO, L.C. GERHARDINGER, M.R.S. MELO. Brazilian aquatic biodiversity in peril. Science, 2015, 350 (6264) 1043–1044.
POLIDORO B.A., K.E. CARPENTER, L. COLLINS. The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS One 5:e10095. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010095, 2010.
QUEIROZ L. Na vida do Cumbe há tanto mangue: As influências dos impactos socioambientais da carcinicultura no modo de vida de uma comunidade costeira. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Brasil, 2007, 121 pp.
QUEIROZ L., S. ROSSI, A.J.A. MEIRELES, and C. COELHO JR. C. Shrimp aquaculture in the state of Ceará, 1970-2012: Trends in mangrove forest privatization in Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2013ª, 73:54-62.
QUEIROZ L., A.J.A. MEIRELES, and S. ROSSI. Serviços Ecossistêmicos Costeiros e Comunidades Tradicionais (Coastal Ecosystem Services and Traditional Communities). Revista da ANPEGE, 2013b, 8(10):145-159.
QUEIROZ L. Industrial shrimp aquaculture and mangrove ecosystems: A Multidimensional analysis of a socioenvironmental conflict in Brazil. PhD Thesis: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). Barcelona, Spain., 2014, 174 pp.
Raheem N., S. Colt, E. Fleishman, el al. 2012. Application of non-market valuation to California’s coastal policy decisions. Marine Policy 36:1166–1161.
RIVERA-FERRE, M.G. 2009. Can export-oriented aquaculture in developing countries be sustainable and promote sustainable development? The shrimp case. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics 22(4):301-321.
ROCHA I.P., J. RODRIGUES, and L.A.A. AMORIM. 2004. Carcinocultura brasileira em 2003. Revista da ABCC, [online] URL: http://www. abccam.com.br.
ROBERTSON A.J., and D.C. DUKE. Mangrove fish-communities in tropical Queensland, Australia: Spatial and Temporal Patterns in densities, biomass, and community structure. Marine Ecology, 1990, 104:369-379.
RÖNNBÄCK P. The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29:235-252.
RÖNNBÄCK P., I. CRONA, and L. INGWALL. The return of ecosystem goods and services in replanted mangrove forests: perspectives from local communities. Environmental Conservation, 2007, 4:313–324.
SAENGER P. Sustainable management of mangroves, in J. Rais, I.M. Dutton, L. Pantimena, R. Dahuri & J. Plouffe (eds), Integrated coastal and marine resource management: Proceedings of International Symposium, Batu, Malang, Indonesia, 25-27 November, National Institute of Technology (ITN) Malang in association with Bakosurtanal and Proyek Pesisir, Malang, Indonesia, 1999, pp. 163-168.
SALAS S., R. CHUENPAGDEE, J.C. SEIJO, and A. CHARLES. Challenges in the assessment and management of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Fisheries Research, 2007, 87: 5–16p.
SATHIRATHAI S. Environmental Governance: The case of industrial waste and pollution management in Thailand under the existing context of globalization. Politics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practices, 2003, 41pp. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/1152/Suthawan__Sathirathai.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
SCHMITHÜSEN F. Challenges to Forest Education in a Changing Social and Academic Environment. Journal of Forest Science, 1999, 45(5):232-234p.
SECRETARIA MUNICIPAL DE SAÚDE. 2012. Ficha de identificação por comunidade, Aracati, Ceará.
SECRETARIA MUNICIPAL DE SAÚDE. 2013. Ficha de identificação por comunidade, Acaraú, Ceará.
SHANAHAN M., C. THORNTON, S. TRENT et al. Smash and Grab, Conflict, Corruption, and Human Rights Abuse In the Shrimp Farming Industry. EJF, London, 2003, 37p.
SHATIRATHAI S, and E.B. BARBIER. Valuing mangrove conservation in Southern Thailand. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2001 19 (2):109-122p.
SMALL C., and R.J. NICHOLLS. A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. Journal of Coastal Research, 2003 19: 584–599p.
SPALDING M.D., M. KAINUMA, and L. COLLINS.2010. World Atlas of Mangroves. Earthscan, London, UK, p 319.
SPANINKS F., VAN BEUKERING,O. 1997. Economic Valuation of Mangrove Ecosystems: Potential and Limitations. CREED Working Paper 14, International Institute for Environmental Development, Amsterdam.
STANLEY D.L. Explaining persistent conflict among resource users: The case of Honduran mariculture. Society and Natural Resources, 1998, 11:267-278p.
STONICH S., J. BORT, L. OVARES. Globalization of shrimp mariculture: the impact on social justice and environmental quality in Central America. Society & Natural Resources 10:161–179, 1997.
THE ECONOMICS OF ECOSYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. In: Sukhdev P (eds). Brussels, 39 p., 2010
TESFAMICHAEL D., T.J. PITCHER, D. PAULY. Assessing changes in fisheries using fishers' knowledge to generate long time series of catch rates: a case study from the Red Sea. Ecol. Soc., 2014, 19 (1), 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06151-190118.
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (UNEP). The Importance of Mangroves to People: A Call to Action. In: van Bochove J (eds) United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, p 128, 2014.
WALTERS B.B., P. RÖNNBÄCK, J.M. KOVACS. Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: a review. Aquatic Botany, 2008, 89(2):220-236.
WARREN-RHODES K., A. SCHWARZ, and L.N. BOYLE. Mangrove ecosystem services and the potential for carbon revenue programmes in Solomon Islands. Environmental Conservation, 2011, 38(04):485-496.
YATES K.L.; D.S. SCHOEMAN. Incorporating the spatial access priorities of fishers into strategic conservation planning and marine protected area design: reducing cost and increasing transparency. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu122.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy Proposal for Free Access Journals
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and The citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).